Wednesday, May 29, 2019
Motivation, Communication and Leadership Theory Essay -- Business and
Motivation, Communication and Leadership TheoryIn this essay I ordain discuss the mixed disparate theories onmotivation such as scientific management e.g. Taylor as well thehumans relation approach such as Maslow and Herzberg and how they subsume to organisations improving their overall effiencentcy. Anotheraspect that I will discuss in the following essay will also be howcommunication posterior affect the productivity of a alliance, I will alsorelate this to motivational scheme. The final aspect of my essay thatI will include is discussing how different leadership styles canaffect the overall productivity of a given company.One motivation theory that some companies used to use was thescientific approach, this was perplex forward by Taylor. It was mainlyused in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Taylor developed his theorywhile he was consummationing his way up from labourer to works manager in anUS steel mill. His theory states that man is a rational economicalanimal concerned with maximising his economic gain. He also statedthat people respond as individuals not groups and he believed peoplecould be treated in a standardised agency like machines.The basic principle that is underlying this approach is if you studywhat happens when you the change different variables in a situation,this will tell you how best to organise the work force. This theory asmenti whizd before relies on the fact that human beings will actrationally and respond to the available incentives. The whole ofTaylors theory is establish on the fact that he believes human argon solelymotivated by money.I believe that this motivational theory is flawed to a authentic degreebecause people do not just work for money they also work to socialiseand many other factors like earning respect from baby buster employees.Taylors theory is based on the fact that your pay should be linked toyour output. This prospect does not appeal to all people as we aredifferent in many ways, it may also lead to emp loyees cutting cornersto make it appear they have done more than they have. This is counterproductive to increase productivity because then the product is justof sub standard quality and most of the time quality is more importantthan quantity in business. Taylors theory was mainly used in the late1800s and early 1900s this shows that his theory is out of date and... ...utcome will be the positive oneyou want.I think that if this theory was used in conjunction with the previoustwo theories it could benefit some companies very well if they appliedif correctly. It would lead to an increase in productivity even thoughthis may only be in the short term, but with regular training coursesand interactions with the people at the top of the company thisincreased train of productivity could be kept at the increased levelwith benefit to employer and employee.There are three main types of leadership one is an autocratic leader.This type of leader will take important decisions without consultin gcolleagues who are lower overthrow the hierarchy. This may in general hang the productivity of employees lower than the leader and thisin turn will lower the productivity on the company overall. The mainreason for this is the fact that the employees lower down thehierarchy will not feel valued because there input is not required indecision making even though they will undoubtedly have valid points toput forward. This will lead to decreased productivity because theyfeel less valued because they are not at the level in the hierarchy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.