Is it possible to see Elizabeth Bennet as a feminist heroine?

Elizabeth white avens is possibly the least conventional of Austens characters, and certainly does not correct to what her society anticipate of her in the way of being submissive. Austen herself admitted that pictures of perfection study me sick and wicked, and so our lovable protagonist Elizabeth is set apart from the traditional heroine with her indep destinationence of mind, and braveness to challenge accepted role of women. To the newfangled day ref her refusal to be the demure, submissive approximationl woman of the turn tabu books written by overmuch(prenominal) a Hannah Moore, insisting girls hould proto(prenominal) acquire a submissive inure and a forbearing spirit allows her to appear a feminist heroine.By refusing cardinal offers of hymeneals Elizabeth exercises her only available method of choice, as Henry Tilney of Austens Northanger Abbey points show up Man has the advantage of choice, woman only the power of refusal. This demonstration of reserve ea rns our respect for Elizabeth as a heroine, and it certainly challenges the societys insistence on the implication of class distinction, appealing to the modern reader.Feminist critics Gilbert and Gubar assert that Elizabeth stands taboo as a teenage woman who has no intention of avocation the prescription of restraint and submission for the achievement of happiness. She demonstrates this with the manner in which she turns follow up Mr. Collins proposal, ex clearing her refusal of his hand in nuptials, You could not make me happy, and I am convinced that I am the last woman in the world who would make you so. Mr. Collins is so shocked by her rationality he believes it throne only be due to her modesty and hopes when I do myself the watch over of speaking to you next I shall hope to receive a much more favourable answer. Her action contradicts entirely the principles set out in the lot books, and the reaction she receives reinforces the unusualness of our heroines honesty. C harlotte, however, seems to conform with societys expectations of a young lady, and accepts as though she is presented with no happy alternative, convinced that my chances of happiness with him is as fair, as intimately people backside boast on entering the marriage state.Austen paints a bleak picture of this marriage for the reader, deeming it impossible for Charlotte to be tolerably happy, and her position reveals the difficulties go about young women, and the pres for sure on them to marry. Elizabeths refusal to submit to this is certainly what sets her apart, with more modern ideas of how women ought to be. When she is around Darcy Elizabeth behaves rattling differently from the more traditional Bingly babes, not allowing her herself to be put start.In their discussion over how accomplished young women are, Elizabeth is not afraid to put her own argument forward, and demonstrates her intelligence and rationality by deducing Darcy moldiness comprehend a great deal in your i dea as an accomplished woman. Miss Bingly on the other hand apparently reiterates what Darcy says, and for this Austen reduces her to his faithful assistant. Miss Bingly tries to creep towards Darcy, with her flattering tone, whereas Elizabeth is far more straightforward, and spirited.The Bingly sisters had turn externald of Elizabeth since her early entrance to Pemberly, exaggerating her state after walking of having a mucky underskirt and messy hair to call her wild. Interestingly it seems she is not only referring to how she looked, besides similarly condemning her out of the ordinary behaviour, de barrierined to look down on the people of Meryton. Having been polite to Elizabeths face Austen reveals the sisters to be false, and unkind.Although Elizabeth does appeal to the reader as a modern heroine, one might argue that Lydia is the sister with the most modern attitude, eloping to a man she lusts after, declaring in her letter that her and Wickhams marriage shall take pace some time or other it does not much signify when. However it is clear Austen disapproves of her attitude, and means for the reader to disapprove of her, by means of the objective narrator a voice condemning her as always unguarded and often uncivil.Perhaps it is as punishment that Lydias married life shall be unfulfilled, as when Austen exiles Maria Betram in Mansfield Park, for running away with Henry Crawford despite her marriage to Mr. Rushworth sent to another country, remote and private. It seems she is also in search of attention, and Gilbert and Gubars observation that marriage is the only getatable form of self-definition for girls in her Jane Austens society helps us to speculate that this may have been her subterranean motive for this relationship.In her letter to Harriett she confirms that she will find their surprise amusing, oh what a great joke it will be , and her frivolous attitude towards her fact demonstrates her selfishness and compulsive mind, which Eliza beth view kindly. When rationally attempting to deter her father from permitting Lydia to accompany Mrs. Forster to Brighton, her advised attitude is prominent as she analyses the danger she poses to the Bennets, explaining our importance, our respectability in the world, must be affected by the wild volatility which marks Lydias character.Her call phrase in the world reminds the reader of the very different world be by the girls, one in which it would not be possible for Lydias conduct to be deemed acceptable. Elizabeths attitudes here puts into perspective that although she challenges the assumed role of women in society, Elizabeth is dummy up sensible to the significance of keeping reputations up, and remains dignified in Austens world. at once more exercising her only power, Elizabeth also refuses Darcys first proposal, despite his having had no doubt of a favourable answer.This attitude is much like Mr. Collins expecting, as most men would at the time, an acceptance from girl with notably a couple of(prenominal) prospects (as picked up on by the Binglys), despite his attitude towards the affair communication his beliefs that it would be a degradation. She appears to rebel against societys expectations, and her contradiction to Darcys assumption that a young woman must accept his hand in marriage is close to humorous, lending emphasis to the significance of Elizabeths choices.When turning him down she tells him in no uncertain terms for why, with a forceful, truthful and compromising response, which uses very plain words like unwillingly which take her straight to point, and point out a rather painful truth. This demonstrates both(prenominal) her independence and the way she challenges the accepted conduct of a young woman of the time, to be perhaps more unselfish of a mans feelings. Elizabeth demonstrates her strength not only by refusing to submit to men, alone also through holding her own with Lady Catherine at both Rosings and Longbourn.She declares herself a gentlemans daughter, and as such Darcys equal, and refutes Lady Catherines accusation that she has upstart pretentions, refusing to conform to her societys expectation of her not to challenge her class superior. Her forwardness is picked up on by Lady Catherine, who is perhaps actually delivering a compliment, rather than a criticism, when noting you give your opinion decidedly so for so young a person. Elizabeth also refuses to be humbled just because Darcy earns ten thousand a year, and is intended to marry Lady Catherines daughters of the same noble line.In these scenes, Elizabeth appeals very much to the less class-conscious modern reader, and it is here that Vivien Jones sees Elizabeth as an gene for change, arguing the old and new are synthesised in the union of the mercantile Gardiners and the landed gentry. This suggests her marriage brings about a healthy change in the novel, as Darcy conquers his pride and welcomes the Gardiners to Pemberly. In this way we might regard Elizabeth as a modern heroine a woman who makes a difference to her society.However, we can not ignore the fact Darcy is as fluent about her inferiority, admitting to having struggled to break down his feelings, as he is about his love for her in his initial proposal. Therefore, it seems their marriage shall be still quite traditional with the woman subservient to her husband. Of course, in Jane Austins society women were still swearing in their marital vows to love, honour and obey, and so some critics argue that by the end, in choosing to marry Mr. Darcy, Elizabeth conforms in the end to the feminine ideal of the helpmeet.She is absorbed into Darcys world, in which she will have footling influence at all. But, we must not ignore the fact that it was, in the end her choice for marriage, and although she could not propose when she wanted it, she made sure it did not take place when it didnt suit her. Uniquely, our heroine stands out as a woman who feels she ma y take liberties with her husband, and to feel this way in such a time must not be overlooked by the modern reader as what is expected. Although Jane Austen herself would never have used the term feminist heroine, there is certainly debate about how she appears to the modern reader.Elizabeth Bennet is certainly appealing as our twenty first century heroine through the intelligence and courage to be independent, and Vivien Jones argues that she has the power to change the social order. However, as Marian Cox observes, though she mocks patriarchal structures, Austen must inhabit them, pointing out that despite Elizabeths independace, she still must marry, for due to the laws of primogeniture she had no other option of maintaining wealth. This does mean Elizabeth can not be seen as a heroine however, as she still challenges her society, and marries a man she loves which is better than most women of the time.